Well, to say that today was nerve-racking and stressful would be a bit of an understatement. As I was responsible for the planning and ultimate implementation of our group’s daily goals and objectives, I was excited to finally lead a day camp but also nervous about completing the necessary tasks so our students would be prepared for Saturday’s symposium. Even though we have maintained productivity over the past four days through engaging and meaningful activities, because of the limited time and the amount of material we wished to cover, each day seemed increasingly crunched for time. Today was of no exception – I was originally hopeful that we would be able to cover a huge amount of ground while still allowing for presentation rehearsals. However, because of awesome discussions of yesterday’s reflections and the development of conclusions based on the collected evidence, we had to be flexible in order to make the most of the remaining time.

To begin the day with a strong start, we met the students at the bus and immediately took them to the cross-quad to “graffiti” a previously prepared “canvas” on one of the tunnel walls. The students were asked to paint evidence of science that they had experienced over the past week in camp. The students were excited to have the opportunity to express themselves in such a medium and “make their mark” as a part of the GRS camp experience. From depictions of the lake and plated bacteria to the pH scale and the graphs we produced as a group, our students loved the activity and the opportunity to experience a different incarnation of scientific thinking.

After our awesome icebreaker, we returned to Dewey Hall and began work on drawing conclusions. We first revisited the student’s reflections from Thursday which focused on their interpretations of the research question and the evidence the students had collected. We worked with the students to compile a list of statements which summarized the ideas that the students had included in their individual conclusions as a means of working toward a single conclusive statement. With the help of all our group members, we worked one-0n-one with the students to examine the statements and develop conclusions using the evidence collected through their investigation. We also used this opportunity to revisit our graphs and discuss how certain representations can be misleading (as can be seen below):


Because of the cooperative work in the “Drawing and Revising Conclusions” activity, the students were more than prepared to compile all of the components of inquiry that have experienced as part of the camp into a presentation for the symposium. Even though the activity took longer than expected, I felt that it was necessary and vital to the students’ understanding of the process of authentic inquiry-based science and for their feelings of ownership and engagement in their experiences over the past five days.

We next broke the students up into two groups to work on the poster and Keynote presentation for Saturday’s symposium. By “dividing and conquering” we were best able to utilize the time available as well as focus on the individual strengths of our students so that they could best contribute to the overall goal. While we did have some issues with keeping certain students engaged for various reasons, in general I thought that we were able to maintain productivity and complete the majority of the two tasks. While the students were working with Carli, Brian, Ashley, and me, Lisa took them out one at a time to ask them various questions about their camp experience as a means of gaining some insight in their feelings about the past five days. It is our hope that the results of these surveys will aid in the continued success of the camp and the improvement of our individual teaching styles.

After a short break, we took the students to Hubbell Auditorium to conduct “dry-runs” of the presentation. This allowed the students to become familiar with both the Keynote presentation and the space itself as a means of reducing any nervousness that might affect their “performance” tomorrow.
As a means of reflection, we asked the students to look back over the past five days and answer the following questions:
- How are you feeling about tomorrow? Do you have any questions about your presentation?
- What was your favorite part about your camp experience?
- Was there something you wish you could have had the opportunity to further investigate? If so, what would it be?
- If you could change anything about the camp for future participants, what would it be?
- Since Monday, how has your view of science changed? Do you see yourself as a scientist now?
Overall, we had a great experience with our students. This has been an amazing learning experience for everyone (I would hope!) and has provided valuable insight into inquiry-based learning and how it’s role in science is crucial to allow for increased comprehension and skill building. I can’t wait to continue with experience like this in preparation for my career as an educator.
GENERAL OVERVIEW OF JAKE’S LESSON PLANS FOR DAY 5
- Students will continue to develop an argument based in evidence
- Students will draw conclusions from collected and analyzed evidence
- Building on previous discussions and blogging activity from Thursday, students will refine conclusions and make hypotheses for further tests
- Students will draw conclusions from collected and analyzed evidence
- Students will design an interactive presentation of their argument and evidence
- Students will compile relevant data and representations to report findings to all participants
- Students will utilize available resources and technologies to enhance presentation
- Poster – Carli, Brian
- Keynote – Ashley, Jake, Lisa
- Students will rehearse their presentation in preparation for Saturday’s symposium
- Students will share out about components of presentation
- rehearse, reflect, rehearse
- Availability of Hubbel?
- Students will reflect on their camp experience and authentic inquiry-based science
- Students will produce a concept map outlining the events of the week and creating a connection to authentic inquiry-based science
- Produce concept map foundation (INQUIRY, M-F, Future)
- Include in poster
- Students will hypothesize possible changes which could be made to improve water ecology at Charlotte Beach
- Students will provide feedback on positive and negative attributes of the Get Real! Science Environmental Action Camp
- Students will produce a concept map outlining the events of the week and creating a connection to authentic inquiry-based science
- Icebreaker
- Painting the tunnel – Evidence of science you’ve experienced this week
- Drawing and Refining Conclusions
- Students will share their blog posts from Thursday (hook up computer to SMARTBoard)
- Present compiled conclusion statement – ask student input
- What could we test to gain more insight?
- i. Test more pH’s
- ii. Does the presence of algae alter the pH of Lake Ontario?
- iii. Does the presence of algae affect bacterial levels in Lake Ontario?
- What could have been done to improve our experiment?
- Presentation Development
- Poster and Keynote Presentation
- Share out about each part
- Rehearse, Reflect, and Rehearse
- Break
- Short activity
- Working snack break?
- Reflection
- Concept mapping
- Possible changes to improve water ecology at Charlotte
- Temperature check – one-on-one


















Yesterday, in preparation for our Get Real! Science Environmental Action Camp, our cohort traveled to the Harley School to meet with students participating in this summer’s Horizon program and who will be a part of our camp group next week. While there, we worked in our groups to assess prior knowledge of various aspects of scientific inquiry and water ecology. Our group focused on the development of testable scientific questions. Given a discrepant event (Elephant Toothpaste – as seen at 