The Role of Technology in Science

August 4th, 2009

The use of technology in the science classroom is something that we are all familiar with and have experienced in our own schooling. The use of microscopes, projectors screens and computers are familiar to most of us, however, the technology I’m going to be speaking about is more innovative: Inspiration software, smartboards, keynote, blogging, flip video cameras, and labquest probes. All of these various pieces of technology were seamlessly integrated into our daily plans during the GRS camp and we as teachers, as well as our students, were extremely lucky to have access to such technology. However, in many traditional classroom settings, these tools aren’t readily available or the teacher doesn’t know how to use or access them.

Fortunately, we do know how to use and access these technologies and I think that the role of technology should be a main but not over-bearing feature in science classrooms. Like any successful routine or strategy used in a classroom, the use of technology should not be distracting or take away from the actual learning that is going on in conjunction with the use of said technology. By integrating various pieces of technology into everyday instruction, teachers can allow their students to expand their learning beyond the borders of traditional resources, such as books and other forms of print. This lends itself extremely well to inquiry-based science teaching because technology can be used to exponentially expand students access to new information, ideas and questions that can help them develop and revise their own investigations. Also, teachers can model the safe and appropriate use of technology such as the internet or delicate probes or microscopes. Additionally, by integrating technology into the classroom, teachers can allow their students to participate in authentic practices that real scientists would carry out in their everyday lives. For example, our students during camp this past week often felt “most like a scientist” when they were using actual technology, such as the probes, microscopes or Microsoft excel software. This shows how by letting students use technology to aid them in the scientific process, they can develop a more meaningful scientific identity in conjunction with their understanding of scientific content.

This is all well and good as long as two interrelated ideas are taken into consideration; first, technology should be used to enhance learning, not simply just to be used “for technology’s sake” and second, teachers need to use technology to its full potential and utilize it in new and innovative ways. Both of these ideas are discussed in depth by Flick & Bell (2000) when they describe how technology can be mis-used in a classroom setting. Specifically, “…taking advantage of technology does not mean using technology to teach the same scientific topics in fundamentally the same ways as they are taught without technology” (Flick & Bell, 2000, p. 44).

Although I still consider myself to be a relative novice with many different types of technology, I don’t think that will discourage my use of it in my own classroom. I think that many teachers shy away from using technology they aren’t familiar with, but I think that by taking a risk and incorporating new and innovative technologies in the classroom, teachers can take advantage of their students’ prior knowledge and develop a strong learning community. Disclaimer: Of course, I’m not encouraging teachers to use technology that they have never tried before! Make sure to try everything multiple times before using it with your students (a valuable lesson we all learned from camp!) but still be open to learning right along side of them.

This course has definitely deepened my understanding of various types of educational technologies and how to use them in my own classroom. With everything that we’ve learned from our mini professional development sessions as well as the lessons we learned from camp in regards to technology, I’m confident that I will be able to bring new and exciting ideas into my classroom this fall!

Final Reflection for GRS Camp

August 4th, 2009

The past week was probably one of the most exhausting experiences of my entire life. Not only did we have to get to the venue 45 minutes before the students, but we also had to spend countless hours planning and preparing for the next day just to do it all over again. But with that said, I think this past week was also one of the most rewarding educational experiences I’ve ever had. It might even be possible that I learned more this week than my students did.

            Some of the things that I’ve learned over the course of camp include how to adapt a lesson on the fly to student feedback, utilizing transitions between activities, ways to make meaningful connections with my students as well as how to seamlessly integrate technology into my practice. First and foremost, I don’t think I could have learned nearly as much if I hadn’t been fortunate enough to get a great group of students and an awesome group of fellow teachers. Our collaboration both in planning and in practice was equally divided and everyone’s input was equally valued. I think this helped us to create a cohesive group with our students throughout the week. And by creating a feeling of community within our group, I think our students felt more comfortable contributing and they truly took pride and ownership in the work that they did. Ana exemplified this pride and ownership during Saturday’s conference. She really shined during our presentation, so much so that she was interviewed alongside Megan on channel 10 news.

Our strong team atmosphere also gave each one of us teachers the chance to learn about each student individually and bring that information back to the group in order to incorporate student interests into daily planning. For example, we noticed that Omari would not contribute anything to whole group discussions when a question was posed to the whole group, but if someone asked for his specific input, he would readily share it. Also, I noticed that he was doodling in his notebook during one of our group discussions, so I asked him if he wanted to be in charge of lettering and font design on our group poster and he said yes. When it came time to work on our presentation, he took charge of the poster organization and really took pride in his design. Over the course of camp we all realized that Demari loved to joke around and say “just playin’” after he made a comment about not liking camp or not waiting to participate. We came to find out that the best thing to do to keep Demari engaged was simply to be patient and he usually came up with an extremely articulate and concise response to any question. Jhade was also a bit of a goofball; he loved to talk and he was very focused on specific details. During he reflections and video interviews, Jhade would carefully choose his words in order to make sure that everything he said came out right. We took a similar approach with Jhade as we had done with Demari; we patiently waited and gave him plenty of time to answer questions and formulate responses and he never disappointed us with his thorough replies. Liam was our focuses and analytical member of the group. He made great connections between all of our activities and we could always rely on him to keep the group on track. Finally, Ana was a ball of energy; she put her energy to good use and could easily articulate each step of our process during her video escapades throughout the week.

            The camp setting really lent itself to authentic scientific inquiry and allowed the students to develop a strong scientific identity. This was evident during their daily journal reflections and video interviews. It was absolutely amazing to follow the progression each student took throughout the week and how they articulated their feelings towards science as the week wore on. A common theme for many of the students was that they “felt like scientists” when they wore scientific equipment, such as hip waders, gloves, goggles and lab coats. For example, after spending some time in the lab on Thursday, Liam said he felt like a scientist because he “wore glasses and a lab coat and analyzed data”. Also, many of the students described their feelings as scientists in reference to steps in the scientific process that we had completed that day, such as data collection or analysis.

            Although the camp setting is extremely conducive to authentic inquiry and fostering scientific identity in your students, it’s also very different from a traditional school setting. In a typical classroom, the student to teacher ratio is much higher and access to sites such as Charlotte Beach and equipment, such as probes, palms and flip videos, is much more limited. However, there are implications from the work we did at camp that can easily be transferred into a traditional classroom setting. The first implication is small group or station work. By dividing a large class into smaller groups or stations, the single classroom teacher can move from group to group and work with the students on a more individualized basis. This simulates some of the one-on-one work that we had the opportunity to do while at camp. A second implication is getting to know your students and incorporating their interests or strengths into everyday classroom practices. Similarly with how we nurtured Omari’s strengths in terms of his creativity and drawing skills, classroom teachers can take the opportunity to get to know their students by using journals or regular reflections and discussing those reflections with their students. A third implication, which is a major focus of this class, is the seamless integration of technology into your instruction. Some teachers find this difficult because they don’t have regular access to technology, however grants are readily available. Also, we have the good fortune of having connections to the vast resources available in the Get Real! Science program. By making technology a part of your instruction, teachers can help students make connections to the science content and their lives as well as helping students to foster a strong scientific identity.

            As I mentioned earlier, camp was an extreme experience: extremely tiring, but extremely rewarding. I’m hoping to integrate many of the things I’ve learned into my practice in this upcoming school year and if I have only a fraction of the success that my group did this past week, then I know I’m doing well!

Science Symposium Success!

August 1st, 2009

We’re finally done! But we definitely ended on a good note! Our presentation went really well this morning due to all the work that our students put in during the entire week. But in the spirit of ending this post on a good note, I’m going to address some of the arrows from today first. The biggest arrow is definitely that only one of our kids made it to the presentation this morning. We called each of the kids houses but unfortunately, we only made contact with one of them. If we could go back, I think we would try to make contact with our students’ families earlier in the week to let them know about the presentations. But from that arrow, there is a huge plus; the one student who did come, Ana, did an amazing job with the entire presentation. I had the privilege of introducing her and the rest of our group to everyone and she stepped up to the podium and rocked! She was cool under pressure and as a result of her awesome presentation, she had the chance to be interviewed with Megan by Channel 10 news. I couldn’t have been more proud of her! And another plus that came along with that is that I had the chance to meet her mom and let her know just how much fun we had with Ana and the rest of the kids this week as well as tell her how proud I was of her. I think the entire day was really successful for everyone and I think it was a great ending to an awesome, but really tiring week. Congrats everyone!

GRS Camp Day 5: Last Day!

July 31st, 2009

What long week it’s been! But also extremely rewarding! Working with our group was an absolute blast and I’m really hoping that they can all make it to our presentations tomorrow. They worked really hard on their keynote slides and tri-fold poster. It was amazing to see them take ownership over the scientific work that they’ve been doing this entire week.

During our debriefing session today, our group had difficulty actually coming up with arrows from today because our lesson was so successful. So I’m going to detail those arrows briefly before I address all the pluses. One of the first arrows is that we ended up rushing through our dry-run of our presentation. This I think could be fixed simply by allotting more time to the dry-run and minimizing some of the distractions that went on during the construction of the presentation slides and poster. Another arrow that kind of resolved itself was that we had some creative differences during our presentation construction section. Some of the students disagreed with how things were arranged or what information should be included, but after some discussions facilitated by my group members and myself, the students resolved their issues and worked really well together.

Since the day was filled with positive moments and great experiences, I’ve got a lot to write about! I think our success from today started with a great teamwork activity that allowed the students to run around and work together to keep multiple balloons up in the air. We let them try a few times and then we tried to beat their time. After we succeeded in beating our kids score, they really wanted to beat our time and they did on their first try. The team building that was built into this activity went on to permeate through the rest of the day. This was especially evident when the kids were working on their presentations. They were extremely engaged in what we needed to accomplish and they exhibited great organizational skills. Since I was working on the tri-fold poster with Omari and Demari, I got the chance to see them sketch out their poster design and script a story that followed our work together through the week. It was awesome! They really took charge of their work and were very particular about how they wanted things to look. The only snag that we hit was towards the beginning of the presentation construction. Demari had volunteered to work on the poster, but he was extremely distracted by the laptops in the room. He wanted to search for poster ideas on the internet, but didn’t really have any idea what he wanted to look for. In order to get him back on track, I took him aside to a separate laptop and logged into my email. He had mentioned on our first day of camp that he wanted to go to the Galapagos islands to see the sea turtles, so I borrowed some of my younger brothers pictures from his class trip to Ecuador and the Galapagos early this summer and showed them to Demari. It only took a minute or two and he was really excited by them. After we looked at the pictures, he wasn’t as interested in goofing around on the computer and he focused on scripting his comments for the poster on the computer. From that point on, he took charge of the poster and worked really hard to get it done just the way he wanted it.

Even though it was the last day and I’m more tired than I think I’ve ever been, I’m really going to miss all of the kids we worked with after tomorrow’s presentations. They have been such a joy to work with and their personalities were so bright and fun. I can’t wait for all of you to see our entire presentation, including our awesome video that highlights all that our kids have done!

GRS Camp Day 4

July 30th, 2009

Today was another successful day at camp. Our focus for the day was that our kids could refine our research model and begin to analyze their data through graphing. To start the day off strongly, we took our kids back into the lab to recap what we did the previous day as well as to get Liam caught up from what he missed yesterday. After that, we continued our refining of our model using the same technique that we did on Wednesday when we refined our research question. We started by explaining how science is tentative and that as scientist, we need to constant reflection and revisit our models and questions. In order to make our model more effective, we had the students write predictions into their journals about the data we collected and where they expected to see different trends. We then asked the students to share their predictions and we used them as a guide to construct what we called a “predictive model” by asking them to predict numerical data values for bacteria and temperature at each site that we sampled. This activity transitioned really well into our graphing activity in which the kids divided into two groups to graph their predictive data vs. the actual data that we collected. Each group then took a few minutes to present their data to each other and start to draw conclusions. We concluded our day with a discussion about the scientific process and some reflections and blogging.
Overall, today was extremely successful, especially our predictive model construction and graphing activity. However, when we spent excessive time in the computer lab, the kids got a little distracted by the chairs and computers. To solve that problem and keep them focused, we revisited our ball toss activity and asked the kids to toss the ball back and forth to determine who was going to go up to the board and add to the scientific process concept map. Another arrow that I noticed was that at one point, one of our kids was doodling in his notebook while we were trying to work on our concept map. I noticed that he wasn’t all that focused, so I asked him if he would want to use his creative ability to help design our presentation poster. He thought that was really cool and when we were brainstorming different ideas for presentation information, he added that we should use a poster and that he really wanted to design it. I thought this was a huge plus that came from an arrow; we really tapped into his strengths and used them to get him excited about what we are working on.
After a very fun, but very long day, I think I’m going to conclude my blog with a picture worthy of a college catalog to go along with the picture of our group owning their work & highlighting their signatures. Enjoy!

GRS Camp Day 3

July 29th, 2009

After the hectic day we had yesterday, today was much more successful. Our transitions between activites were much improved and we utilized the time it took for us to travel from building to building as a time to continue to get to know our students and introduce the upcoming activities. Also, a huge plus for the day was that our kids really enjoyed their time in the lab and got so excited to actually check out the samples that we had collected yesterday. They were extremely patient when counting the bacterial colonies, especially when one of our plates had 355! They also really liked getting the chance to inspect the algae we collected using the microscopes. And to top it off, there were absolutely no complaints about having to wear safety gear, like lab coats and glasses. I think this really says a lot about our group and the entire camp; safety is such a non-issue because I think we’ve made a conscious effort to make it a continuous and necessary part of our everyday planning and practice.

 

Another huge plus that I know many people we interested about it class today was our procedure for how we revisited our research question. After Tuesday’s lesson, the question we had come up with as a group was “What is the major cause of E. coli at Charlotte Beach?” Now as you probably can all see, the question itself isn’t inherently wrong, but we definitely weren’t satisfied with it. In order to address the problem, we devised an activity that required the students to come up with at least two predictions about what we measured at the beach (temp, pH, DO & bacteria/water samples). From there, we used a sample prediction and converted it into a question. After that, each student was asked to convert at least one of there predictions into a question and then share that question with the group. And this was where the magic happened! Miraculously, the first question that was shared was “Does temperature affect bacterial growth?” We were all exchanging looks of sheer euphoria at this point because our previous days attempts had been so terrible. From there, we came up with two questions (both are very similar): “Does high temperature and high pH cause bacteria to grow?” and “Does low temperature and low pH kill bacteria?” After we came up with these much improved questions, we revisited our original question and asked “Can we convert this question back into a prediction?” And the obvious and immediate answer was no. This allowed us to discuss that although our original question wasn’t bad, it was a testable question and that having a testable question is an integral part of a scientific investigation.

Now that I’ve talked about all the good stuff, I’m going to briefly address a couple of arrows. Arrow #1: technology difficulties. The SmartBoard was acting funny, the laptops were password protected and the electronics in Gleason Library were offline. Most of these could be fixed by running through everything with the appropriate technology before, but some, like the library situation, can’t really be forseen. As a result, I think we’re always going to keep that in mind when planning. Arrow #2: Sick children. One of our kids went home sick after throwing up and the other ate a snack processed in a peanut plant, even though he has a peanut allergy. Unfortunately, these can’t be predicted either, but they did provide our entire class with the chance to talk about student health and safety and ways to make sure that all of our kids are taken care of at all times. However, I think considering the circumstances, we really rolled with the punches today and took it all in stride (sorry for the cliches!)

GRS Camp Day 2

July 28th, 2009

In one word, today was crazy. But crazy in a good & bad day. As for the good, when the kids had the chance to get into the water and start collecting data, they did an excellent job. They rolled with the punches and we’re very patient as well slowly moved along the beach. We divided into two groups; three kids went into the water with Kristine and our other two kids went out onto the boat with Maeghan. The in the water each rotated their roles and took turns using the probes and whirl-pack bags. Even Ana, our most reluctant camper to be near the water on Day 1, jumped right into her hip waders and got right into the water. It was great to see her and all of our kids so fired up about getting into the muck and algae. Another aspect that I was so proud of them for was that they graciously shared their probes without any complaints when another group needed to use them.

Now onto the not-so-good stuff. We definitely struggled with our question revision activity today. The students had come with a good question on Monday, but it wasn’t as specific and testable as it needed to be, so we tried to work together to come up with a way to fix it. Unfortunately, we couldn’t quite get the wording right. The kids were dancing around the right terms, but struggled actually putting them into a new question. Part of that could have been that the physical set up of this activity wasn’t ideal; we were all stretched out along a table, so some of the kids couldn’t hear what the others were saying and had difficulty looking at the poster board we were working on. But with even mis-step, there is room for improvement. Tomorrow, we plan on scaffolding a series of questions to guide our kids in the right direction. We’re going talk about what it means to be a testable question and how predictions and testable questions can be related to each other. We’re also going to draw upon some of our data to help us with this. Although today didn’t go exactly as planned (not that anything really does), it was fairly successful and we definitely have a lot of data that can be analyzed and discussed over the next few days.

I also wanted to add a couple of things to this post; first, is our team picture. We had all of our campers today, so we got a great group shot that we also posted on our group blog, the Charlotte Crusaders. Second, I wanted to share something that we made that has been really helpful in giving our kids background information. We made a simplified version of the resource packet that we received in Dawn’s class and made copies for each kid. For the past two days at camp, we’ve incorporated the use of the resource packet into our question construction and discussion as a way to give kids information without just telling them.

Here’s our awesome group!

GRS Camp Day 1

July 27th, 2009

What a success! I don’t think we could have asked for a better first day…the weather was great (with the exception of the wind blowing over the lake and bringing with it the smell of rotting algae and nasty water), our kids were awesome and all our plans worked out really well. To start off, our group of students were amazing. They asked a bunch of really great questions, they were actively engaged in all the activities and one even said, “I though today was going to be all jibberish…but it wasn’t”. The only downside in terms of our group is that we were missing our only YMCA student so he’ll be a bit behind the eight ball tomorrow. However, as part of our plans, we’re going to have our group lead a summary/recap session at the beginning of camp tomorrow to get him up to speed and refresh themselves about what we did and where we’re going.

Another huge plus was that our planning was very successful. Megan was the leader of the day and we each lead separate activities. The timing was on schedule for the whole day, with each activity alloting enough time to be effective without being too long or boring. This is definitely something that we want to carry over into tomorrow’s activities.

Overall, our first day went extremely well, but as always, there is definitely room for improvement. One of our focus points for tomorrow and the rest of camp is working on properly phrasing our question so we don’t ask too many leading or close-ended questions. We would like to have a good balanced between short answer and more open-ended questions throughout the next four days. Also, we want to be cognizant of the addition of another student into our group. Since he wasn’t with us today, we want to make sure that he’s included not only in our academic work, but also in our team dynamic. The four students that we had today had a great sense of community and teamwork very early on and we want to try to foster that during the next four days, paying particular attention to how our newest member will fit into that equation.

After a very successful, but albeit very long first day, I’m hoping that our good planning and good luck will shine through tomorrow so we can achieve that same level of success. Especially because I’m in charge tomorrow!

Reflections on Modeling Concept Interview

July 23rd, 2009

I think that my entire group would agree that our concept interviews were very successful. We had the opportunity to assess the students prior knowledge with a quick report sheet that asked them what they already knew about models and it was followed up by an activity that allowed the students to create their own models using a variety of materials. To conclude each station, we had a quick discussion about the advantages and limitations of using the various materials (markers & paper, pipe cleaners and play-doh) to make models and we ended with the question “What do you think a model is?”

From our station, we learned that most of the students were already somewhat familiar with models and that they understood that some models can be physical representations of other things. Also, our station gave the students an opportunity to gain some experience creating their own models. However, there are some things that I think we could have improved upon that might have allowed us to learn more about our students. First, I think it would have been beneficial for us to discuss that models can be more than just physical representations and that these models can be tentative or provide a predictive power that allows them to be used in experiments. I think if we had had more time we could have better assessed those understandings. Second, since it was our first experience collaborating as a group, I think that we probably got a little too excited and talked a bit too much. I think if we had the chance to do this again, our entire group could focus on giving the students a little more quiet work time during our station.

Having said all this, I think that we gained some very valuable information that can be beneficial for us and all the other groups at camp. We plan on building on our students prior experience with modeling at our station to help facilitate the creation of a model of the beach that can be used during their investigations. I can’t wait to see what they will come up with!

Science Speak: How do we get kids to do it?

July 20th, 2009

After our debriefing session this afternoon, I really got to thinking about a couple of the suggestions and things to think about that April proposed. One in particular stuck out to me: How do we press students for scientific explanations? Or, alluding to the title of this post, how do we get kids to speak science? Obviously this isn’t something that I have the answer to or plan on getting the answer to in the near future, but I think that it warrants conversation and consideration, especially before we start camp next week. I think by pushing our students to provide evidence and support their arguments allows for a much deeper assessment of their prior knowledge as well as anything new that they have learned.

I also think that the idea of scientific explanations is particularly relevant to the Windschitl reading from this week. He discusses how scientific knowledge and understanding is achieved through persuasion, which he defines as “presenting plausible and defensible explanations for how the natural world works” (Windschitl, p. 13). By using this definition, I think students will be able to better understand the subjective nature of science and how it is affected by both “facts” and interpretations of those facts.

My main goal with this particular post was just to start the conversation about scientific explanations, with particular emphasis on their role at camp next week. So I’m going to pose this question (please feel free to comment or add more questions): How are we going to elicit scientific explanations from the kids? In what ways can we plan for that? I’m open to any suggestions!